top of page

Process Efficiency SWOT for a Research Nonprofit

The question. A research-driven nonprofit serving families and youth wanted to know why its communication and community engagement work kept stalling, even with a strong reputation and a modern tool stack.

​

What I found. The organization had real strengths: trusted research, a loyal audience and software it was already paying for. But dissemination had no owner, handoffs between departments broke down, KPIs lived in scattered documents and critical workflows depended on a single staff member.

​

What I recommended.

  • Automate 9 of 12 recurring manual steps (75%) using tools already licensed, freeing about 6 staff hours per week

  • Consolidate content from seven formats to three, cutting production effort by about 57% while still reaching roughly two-thirds of the audience

  • Stand up a one-page KPI dashboard and a RACI matrix (who is responsible for what) for every new project

  • Grow program revenue to reduce dependence on expiring grants

  • Deliver a 45-day playbook of five actions, each scoped at two hours to one week

​

Why it matters. The fixes needed no new budget. They needed clear ownership and better use of systems the organization already had.

​

Outcome. Leadership presented the analysis to its board to shape the following year’s planning.

Title slide: Process Efficiency SWOT for a Research Nonprofit
SWOT matrix: strong research credibility, weak process ownership
Quantified opportunities: 75% of manual steps automatable, about 6 staff hours freed per week, content formats cut from 7 to 3
Automation map: 12 recurring steps across three workflows, 9 automatable with existing tools
45-day playbook: five process improvement actions, each scoped at two hours to one week
bottom of page